LinkedIn·Tuesday, 28 July 2026·29d ago
Your compliance team works in spreadsheets. Your engineering team works in CI/CD pipelines. And somehow both are supposed to keep your…
CODIFIC
1,771 followers
Your compliance team works in spreadsheets.
Your engineering team works in CI/CD pipelines.
And somehow both are supposed to keep your product secure.
That gap is exactly why #traditional GRC is failing software teams, and why Product Risk and Compliance (#PRC) is taking its place.
We put together a short explainer on what PRC is and why it matters:
✔️ Why legacy GRC frameworks weren't built for modern software products
✔️ The three pillars of PRC: threat modelling, supply chain risk management, and process maturity
✔️ How cross-mapping lets you verify once and comply with multiple frameworks
✔️ Why compliance should be a byproduct of secure engineering, not a parallel exercise
If you or your team is navigating CRA, NIS2, or any product-level security regulation, this should be an interesting concept. 🎬
Cross-referenced
Related on the wire
"You're right; we need to build this in." So what happens after a #SAMM assessment? That's usually where this service begins. Common next…
Where are the weak or missing controls in your systems - before someone else finds them? Three ways we help, depending on what you need:…
Do you actually know where your secure development program stands? OWASP SAMM is open source so you can assess yourself. But here's the…
"How do we actually do better, so that the path of least resistance is the more secure path?" That's the question Brian Glas keeps coming…
31 days until the first #CRA obligation goes live... 📢 On 11 September 2026, manufacturers must be ready to report actively exploited…
Most teams know they should be #threat #modelling. But SAMM #Benchmark data shows very few actually do. 🤷 The reasons? It lives in a…