LinkedIn·Wednesday, 19 August 2026·7d ago
Most microservice transaction discussions start with technology. We think there is a better question to ask first: **What happens if this…
Atomikos
1,678 followers
Most microservice transaction discussions start with technology.
We think there is a better question to ask first:
**What happens if this operation fails halfway?**
For example:
A database update succeeds, but the message is never sent.
A message is received, but the database update fails.
A service call times out, and the caller does not know whether the remote update committed.
These are not edge cases.
They are the cases that decide whether a distributed system can recover reliably.
That is why our ebook Microservice Transaction Patterns focuses on practical patterns for these failure points, including:
- Exactly-once sender
- Exactly-once receiver
- Exactly-once messaging
- Transactional call
- TCC
The goal is simple:
Keep related business updates consistent, even when something fails halfway.
We cover all five patterns in our free Microservice Transaction Patterns ebook. Link in the comments.
💬 1
View on LinkedIn Cross-referenced
Related on the wire
What disappeared when Java moved away from application servers? More than many teams realized. Application servers bundled a lot together:…
A transaction manager does not prevent failures. It determines what should happen when they do. Imagine one business operation needs to do…
Reliable messaging has two sides. Sending reliably means making sure a business update and its outgoing message stay consistent. Receiving…
Most architecture diagrams show the happy path. But reliability is usually decided somewhere in the middle. Consider a simple workflow: -…
Twenty years ago we thought the hard problem was distributed transactions. Today we think it's something else. Over two decades of working…
We didn't start by trying to replace application servers. We started by asking a different question. Years ago, many enterprise Java…