LinkedIn·Thursday, 20 August 2026·5d ago
The first FDA warning letter involving AI in a GMP environment wasn’t really a warning about AI. 👀 It was a warning about governance. AI…
Scilife
88,259 followers
The first FDA warning letter involving AI in a GMP environment wasn’t really a warning about AI. 👀
It was a warning about governance.
AI can draft faster, retrieve information faster, and surface patterns humans might miss.
But it doesn’t inherit accountability.
As AI becomes part of everyday quality work, the important question is no longer “Should we use it?”
It’s:
Can our quality system govern it?
In this edition of our newsletter, we look at what this case tells us about human oversight, AI-assisted records, ALCOA+, and the governance foundations quality teams need as AI becomes part of regulated workflows.
Read the full article 📖
The first FDA AI warning letter wasn't about AI. It was about governance.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/first-fda-ai-warning-letter-wasnt-governance-scilife-0wdic?trackingId=LmmMObNcJC8OpRGGoVr6EA%3D%3D
♥ 25💬 2
View on LinkedIn Cross-referenced
Related on the wire
Quality culture lives both in the policy and in the corridor conversations. How people understand quality, if they feel valued or not and…
Scilife is strengthening its position in the US market with another addition to our Partner Network. Forest Pond Associates is officially…
Operating across the EU vs the US means dealing with two different regulatory bodies that require different documentation and impose…
"Quality is a shared responsibility." We say it a lot. But it’s not present a lot in many organizations. So how do we get from proclaiming…
We get it, QA has to be the one that says no sometimes. If we didn’t we wouldn’t be doing our job. Because of that QA has earned an unfair…
Validation has a lifecycle. Your system does too. Going live in a validated state is only the beginning. Changes happen. Access evolves.…